Plain English

JD Vance just let the cat out of the bag - to the Americans the 'special relationship' with the UK is not only not special, it's laughable.

Many of us have long suspected this to be the case but it's helpful to have it finally confirmed for the avoidance of any doubt by someone at the heart of the US administration. Vance obviously believes his role as Vice President is to act as an agent provocateur, sowing alarm and discord amongst former allies the better to wrong foot them. He demonstrated this in his castigation of the assembled delegates at the recent Munich Security Conference and again in the Oval Office last Friday at the car crash of a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky. 

Now, he's upset the US' two major European allies, Britain and France, by suggesting that they haven't had relevant battle experience in the last thirty or forty years to enable them to support Ukraine against Putin's aggression. When it was pointed out to him by aggrieved politicians on both sides of the English Channel that they had, in fact, stood firm with the US in Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11, at great cost in terms of lives and materiel, he pulled back, saying he had never named the countries he was alluding to. This was highly disingenuous, of course, and fooled no-one - who else could he possibly have meant? But we are living in the post-truth era - as witness Trump's social media platform, Truth Social, apparently so-called without a trace of irony - so this is to be expected.

However, in blurting out an uncomfortable truth about the real nature of the Transatlantic alliance Vance may finally, if inadvertently, have cut the Gordian knot that has tied the UK to the US for too long. Meanwhile NATO, as we've known it since its founding in 1949 (in Washington DC by the way) is rapidly unravelling and how it might reinvent itself, with or without the US, has suddenly become a hot topic, with an irritated Canada joining European leaders in standing up to Trump's bullying. Doing so will be costly but it's long overdue.

In my opinion sustaining the fiction of a special relationship with the US has been especially disadvantageous to the UK for decades and should have been ditched as long ago as the Suez Crisis in 1956, when the US shafted Anthony Eden and the UK in order to claim its global superpower status. Unfortunately, Thatcher and Reagan's love-in, and later the Bush-Blair bromance, kept the comatose pact on life-support. The UK's pathological Euroscepticism did the rest. 

Had we thrown in our lot wholeheartedly with the European project we would almost certainly have had a European army, and possibly a European state, by now. How differently things might have played out had we done so. Instead, the US played us like a fiddle with their cunning divide-and-rule strategy. Successive UK Prime Ministers have been suckered into believing in the specialness of our supposedly unique ties. But let's be frank, we were mortal enemies from the Revolution of 1776 who managed to patch up a pragmatic alliance post-Independence, but with little love lost on either side. Hell, the Brits even burned down the White House in 1812! Ah, those were the days...

Collectively, European nations have military personnel numbering around 2.6 million, twice the size of US combined services. What they currently lack is the integration to work together collaboratively as a united force but that could change rapidly as Trump and Putin continue on their chosen trajectories. NATO forces have just concluded joint manoeuvres, 'Steadfast Dart 2025', in Romania, Bulgaria and Greece, with 'Joint Viking' Norwegian winter exercises, including allied soldiers, running until 14 March. Europe is discovering its common ground in response to hostile external actions and rhetoric.

The common bond between the US and UK is supposedly the English language but even that, as Oscar Wilde pithily observed, divides us. It no longer represents a shared heritage, having evolved very differently on opposite sides of the Atlantic since the seventeenth century, but rather has become the cause of much misunderstanding. In 2025, it is barely mutually comprehensible and our idiosyncratic usages are as liable to sow confusion as foster unity. 

Culturally, we have much more in common these days with Europe than with the US and the fact that the EU, despite the UK's departure, still uses English as an official language in its deliberations leaves the door open for us. The US is rapidly becoming unrecognisable and uncongenial. As Californian rapper, Kendrick Lamar Duckworth, put it in his infamous 'diss' track last year (albeit in a very different context) "they not like us".

They really aren't, you know.

Popular posts from this blog

A knight's tale - creative non-fiction

Looking to Africa - long read

On old age