Two wrongs...
Yesterday, as the world focused on the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz-Birkenau in Poland, hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestians were streaming back to their destroyed or damaged homes in the north of the Gaza Strip.
The images of both events being beamed simultaneously around the globe could hardly have provided a starker or more telling juxtaposition. It wasn't meant to be this way. Under the terms of the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas the internally displaced Gazans were due to make their return journey on Sunday. However, when Israeli hostage, Arbel Yehoud, was not released as expected, Israel accused Hamas of violating the agreement and checkpoints to the north remained closed. They opened instead on Monday, releasing the reverse exodus, thus coinciding with Holocaust Memorial Day (officially International Holocaust Remembrance Day). Someone hadn't thought it through - the 'optics', as they say, were not good.
I'm sure many will have found this unfortunate clash of events as deeply unsettling as I did. It begged so many uncomfortable questions that I found myself unable to write about it yesterday; the emotion was simply too raw and needed processing. Having slept on it - a disturbed night I might add - I'm still conflicted but at least clear that I need to write about it rather than self-censoring out of fear of offending sensibilities at such a painful moment for the Jewish community.
As yesterday's ceremonies in Poland and around the world highlighted, that community has suffered egregiously. However, that does not - nor should it - exempt the community from a rigorous examination of Israel's actions in Gaza. In fact, if anything, the Jewish community's uniquely terrible (though sadly not unique) experience of genocide and other acts of gross inhumanity places a clear obligation upon it to act as an exemplar of restraint. While holding Jews, and the Jewish state, to a higher set of principles may be deeply unfair, it is surely an inevitability of this lamentable history.
Life isn't fair - something to which Jews, of all people, can attest - but having been victims of persecution for millennia they are bound to be criticised if they then inflict disproportionate suffering on others. Like it or not, they are held to a higher account as a result of their troubled history and hypocrisy will not be readily forgiven. Rather than seeing that as an unfair burden, they should, I suggest, embrace the imperative it imposes upon them to sieze the moral high ground and lead by example. The elderly survivors who spoke so movingly at Auschwitz yesterday clearly understood that.
This is not to say that the Israeli state should not have retaliated against Hamas for its despicable attack on 7 October 2023. No-one could have expected them to turn the other cheek in the face of such a shocking assault and, under international law, they were perfectly entitled to respond, though in a proportionate way. Instead, the government of Benjamin Netanyahu far exceeded the strict limitations imposed by international law and the rules of war, not to mention morality. It transgressed them shamelessly and it is to be hoped will eventually be held answerable.
Because it is disingenuous to claim there was no other way to punish Hamas than by launching an indiscriminate strike against a defenceless population. The fact that the Israel Defence Force (IDF) was able to eliminate Hamas and Hezbullah leaders and operatives with such surgical efficiency in Lebanon and Tehran, using exploding mobiles, pre-placed explosive devices and intelligence-led precision bombing, demonstrates that other methods than mass-destruction were readily available to Netanyahu.
That he chose not to employ them in Gaza suggests that the systematic destruction of infrastructure in the Strip, with the death of some 47,000 civilians, was a deliberate policy decision. To hope to be spared scrutiny or accountability after the grotesque provocation of the 7 October attack may be understandable but Israel's asymetrical response shows that another agenda was in play, namely ethnic cleansing. It was not only morally and legally indefensible but ineffective in its own terms as it was bound to act as a recruiting sergeant for Hamas. The number of triumphant Hamas fighters present at the release of four female Israeli hostages last Saturday proved this. Hamas had not been crushed and the ramifications of Israel's actions will reverberate for generations.
The foundation of the modern state of Israel in 1948, resulting in the displacement and dispossession of millions of Palestinian Arabs in what they refer to as the Nakba or Catastrophe, is deeply problematic, to put it mildly. But it is a fait-accompli and, as a consequence, the so-called 'two-state solution' must be made to work. The world may have turned a blind eye to Israeli intransigence, enabling the current chaos in the Gaza Strip, West Bank and wider region, but the problem has not gone away. In fact it has just got much worse.
If the lessons of the Holocaust are not learned, we are all the losers.