Plus ça change

They say there's nothing new under the sun and official papers from 2003, newly-released by the National Archives, certainly seem to show that to be true.

Across a wide range of issues, from immigration to the Good Friday Agreement and the Parthenon Sculptures, Tony Blair, during his premiereship, was beset by many of the same problems now facing Rishi Sunak. He dealt with them very differently, though. Take immigration, for example. In 2002 asylum applications had reached 84,132 but through imposing tougher measures on border control and visas - and bearing in mind the UK was still in the EU, with more porous borders - the annual number of asylum applications fell to a low of 17,916 by 2010, the last year of the Labour administration. It now stands at almost the level it did in 2002 - and still the small boats cross the English Channel.

One of the surprising suggestions put to Blair for a deterrent to asylum seekers was to accommodate them in a camp on the Isle of Mull. You have to wonder whether that would have served as a more effective disincentive than Rwanda. Of course, it was never implemented, and it seems highly likely that the Rwanda proposal will go the same way.

The Northern Ireland Protocol, signed with the EU by Sunak's predecessor-but-one, Boris Johnson, continues to plague Sunak, whose much-vaunted Windsor Framework was supposed to solve the problems of the flow of goods between the Province and Great Britain. The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) remains to be convinced, however, and has withdrawn its support. As a result, the Northern Ireland Assembly at Stormont has not been sitting for almost two years. Compare this to Blair's triumphant negotiations to secure the Good Friday (or Belfast) Agreement in 1998. 

Also revealed in the release of papers is Blair's openness to, indeed enthusiasm for, the idea of returning the Parthenon Sculptures ('Elgin Marbles') to Greece. This was in order to smooth the way to securing London's bid to host the 2012 Olympic Games. Contrast this with Sunak's recent petulant last-minute cancellation of a meeting with the Greek Prime Minister, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, in Downing Street after Mitsotakis had the temerity to discuss the sculptures' return on the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg show the day before. Hardly a statesmanlike gesture and not the way to make friends and influence people one would have thought. It may, though, have provided a welcome boost for the campaign to return the Acropolis frieze to Athens.

And so, across a range of issues, Sunak looks more and more like one of history's political lightweights. He has consistently botched the job of Prime Minister and it probably says more about the disarray within the Conservative ranks in Parliament than it does about his competence in office that he remains in his place. 

It's looking like his party is reconciled to electoral defeat next year, after which a battle royal for the leadership, and soul (if it can be said to have one), of Conservatism will inevitably ensue. Doubtless contenders will put party before country, and personal advantage before both, in an unseemly scramble for power and influence. Perhaps posterity's kindest judgment of Sunak will be that at least he didn't lead his country into an illegal and unwinnable war. Climate catastrophe might be a different matter.

That apart, Sunak is destined to feature as a mere footnote in the often-inglorious history of British PMs.



Popular posts from this blog

On old age

"The fact is that when I come to think it over, I find that there are four reasons for old age being thought unhappy: First, that it withdraws us from active employments; second, that it enfeebles the body; third, that it deprives us of nearly all physical pleasures; fourth, that it is the next step to death."  Writing his essay,  De Senectute (On Old Age), in 44 BCE, Marcus Tullius Cicero went on to refute these four supposed reasons in characteristically robust and forthright manner. Cicero wasn't one to sit about moping in his own old age; he remained actively engaged in the political life of the Republic whose survival, in the face of tyranny, he championed so fiercely.  Cicero was nine years younger than I am now when he met his untimely end yet he considered himself already an old man; or, rather, his society judged him to be so. His second point about age enfeebling is more germane. Physical decline had not yet impacted him but, six years on from my retirement, I
Read more

Born to rule

When, ten days ago, I posted my piece about the manipulated image of Catherine, Princess of Wales, and her children (see Snap Judgment) I didn't know of her cancer treatment. Had I known, I would have adopted a gentler, though I hope no less critical, tone. But I didn't know, and nor did any of us outside the immediate royal circle, which rather goes to strengthen the case against the monarchy. For Kate and her family the diagnosis of cancer (as yet unspecified) will have been a devastating blow, as will the chemotherapy she is currently undergoing. On a human level, of course I sympathise and extend my best wishes for a full recovery as, indeed, I did at the time of her father-in-law's diagnosis. It is particularly cruel, then, that on top of all this she has been obliged to record a video statement to reassure the public. As if she didn't have enough to contend with already. But such is the unpalatable obligation placed upon any royal personage - noblesse oblige. Whic
Read more

Working to rule

An avowed republican I may be but news of King Charles III's cancer diagnosis is nevertheless a cause of sadness - I might not want him, or anyone else, as my king but I wish the man no harm.  However, Jonathan Swift's opinion that "health is the greatest of all possessions; a pale cobbler is better than a sick king" serves as a timely reminder that ill-health in the monarch is not simply a personal matter, it has constitutional implications. To be blunt about it, Charles' death, in constitutional terms at least, would be no great problem; the king is dead, long live the king. The succession is assured and the crown would pass immediately to the Prince of Wales, who would be pronounced William V. The ship of state would sail on. A long-term or debilitating illness, on the other hand, could have far-reaching consequences for the institution of the monarchy at a sensitive time, coming so soon after the death of Britain's longest-reigning monarch, Charles' mo
Read more